4 Essential Characteristics of an Effective Investigator

The detective, who is constantly solving difficult cases, often says it is lucky. Although this is partly true, it is probably only a small part of what actually makes the investigator effective. In order to be an effective detector, it must possess and develop some basic characteristics beyond proper preparation. Some of these features are as follows:

1. Self-Discipline

Every successful detective needs a high degree of self-discipline. This self-discipline helps the investigator's behavior to ensure that only legally acceptable and ethical methods of investigation are used to resolve the cases. Successful detectives are always alert and attentive to the matter and never leave anything to chance. Every step of the test must be carefully calculated and never given a chance that could endanger the case. Reasoning Ability

This is based on the fact that the investigator is able to draw conclusions from the evidence discovered during the investigation. The fact that it is able to analyze the multitude of facts and determine how they relate to each other is essential to successful investigations. Although law enforcement agencies regularly exercise this property, this mental challenge is part of the detective routine.

The reasoning methods contain two groups:

Deductive reasoning: The deductive reasoning is exercised on a daily basis by almost every detective. The detective's job is to uncover the facts in the case to resolve the case. In the case of deductive reasoning, the person deducts certain information without certain facts.

Inductive reasoning: By using inductive reasoning, the detective can avoid narrowing his perceptions. It is always best to have all the facts to be achieved before it can be reached what has happened and how and for whom.

Criminal Example:

A detective can arrive at the scene of death and observe a gunshot wound to the deceased right temple and a weapon that is still in the man's right hand. The deceased is at their home, there is no evidence that he was forced to enter, and preliminary information indicates that the deceased have no enemies. The detective uses deductive reasoning to conclude that the deceased committed suicide by using the weapon.

However, if inductive reasoning had been applied, the investigator would not have been so quick to come to a conclusion before he knew all the facts. In this example, the investigator had to wait and have been given all the facts before he could come to a conclusion. Perhaps he learned that the area where the deceased lived was a target of armed "knocking and robbery" criminals. He may have learned that the bullet that killed the victim was another caliber than the weapon in his hand. Based on these two additional evidence, the investigator probably gave a different opinion on the circumstances of death.

The ability to argue is important because the detector is being asked to draw conclusions on the topics. You may have heard that you would not put your opinions into the reports. However, investigators are working on the nature of their work. This is a serious responsibility.

Detectives are considered in many respects as experts. In addition to this recognition, he takes responsibility for developing the case, but acts responsibly and ethically. Most people are able to draw good conclusions (conclude the answer) from a series of facts. This conclusion does not necessarily have to agree with the conclusion that other investigators have also drawn (reasonable people can have a genuine disagreement). The problem arises when a detective refuses to recognize or acknowledge that his bias influences action.

Source by sbobet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *